Buyer's guide

Kaizen software for office teams: what to look for

By KaizenProof · Updated

In short

Kaizen software is a tool that helps a team capture everyday problems in its work, find their causes, put small fixes in place and check that the fixes held. For an office team, the test of such a tool is whether the person who meets a problem can take it from a sentence to a written fix without a facilitator, and whether anyone looks again a month later.

Teams use four kinds of tool for this: shared spreadsheets and boards, idea or suggestion platforms, continuous improvement platforms run by an improvement office, and guided problem-solving tools. Each fits a different team.

The Plan, Do, Check, Act cycleA circle in four parts, in order: Plan, Do, Check and Act. An arrow leads from Act back to Plan, so the cycle starts again.PlanDoCheckAct

The Plan, Do, Check, Act cycle

  1. PlanUnderstand the problem
  2. DoMake one change
  3. CheckSee whether it held
  4. ActKeep it, or go again

Four kinds of tool teams use for Kaizen

Spreadsheets and general boards

A shared sheet or a task board is free and flexible. It records problems well, but it does not help anyone find a cause, and nothing reminds the team to check whether a fix held. It tends to last as long as the person who set it up keeps it going. For when that is enough, see KaizenProof vs a spreadsheet and a free 5 Whys template.

Idea and suggestion platforms

These collect ideas from many people, often through campaigns, with voting and review by a manager or committee. They suit organisations that want breadth of ideas. The person with the problem usually hands it over and waits for someone else to decide.

Continuous improvement platforms

Built for an improvement office or a Lean or Six Sigma programme: project tracking, A3s, approvals, portfolio reporting and integrations. They suit large programmes with dedicated staff and are usually bought through a sales process.

Guided problem-solving tools

These walk one person through one problem: describe it, find the cause, decide the change, follow up. They suit teams without a Lean specialist, where the person who meets the problem should also be the one who fixes it. KaizenProof is this kind of tool.

One office problem in each kind of tool

Take one problem: supplier invoices keep arriving without a purchase order number, and are paid late while someone finds out who ordered. This is what each kind of tool typically holds once the problem has been entered.

The same problem, as it typically ends up in each kind of tool
Kind of toolWhat gets recordedWhat happens next
Spreadsheet or boardA row saying invoices arrive without a PO number, status openWhatever the person who keeps the sheet does with it
Idea platformAn idea to make the PO number mandatory, with votes and commentsIt waits for a reviewer to accept, reject or assign it
Continuous improvement platformA project with an owner, a charter and often an A3It is tracked and reported with the rest of the programme
Guided problem-solving toolThe why-chain down to a cause, and a written fixThe person who reported it acts on the fix and is asked later whether it held

None of these is wrong. They answer different questions: where is the list, which ideas are worth doing, how is the programme going, and what is the cause of this one problem. The same invoice problem is worked through in full on Kaizen for finance teams; there are matching pages for HR and customer service.

A checklist for choosing Kaizen software

  1. Can someone with no Lean training report a problem in their own words in about a minute?
  2. Does it help find the cause, for example with a 5 Whys, rather than only storing the complaint?
  3. Does it ask whether a step should exist at all before proposing to automate it?
  4. Does the fix come out as something a team can act on: a ticket, a written procedure, a specification?
  5. Does it check back after the change, and record whether it held or slipped?
  6. Are its numbers honest: estimates kept apart from confirmed results, as in measuring improvement honestly?
  7. Is the price predictable as more people join, and can you try it without a sales call?
  8. Is it clear where your text is stored and which providers process it?

How KaizenProof works

  1. A person describes one recurring friction in plain text, optionally with how often it happens and how long it takes.
  2. The product names the kind of waste in plain words, such as "Waiting: for an approval, a reply, a queue or a system", using the 8 wastes.
  3. It asks why, one question at a time, until the person confirms a root cause in a process, policy, tool or ownership gap.
  4. It asks whether the step should exist. When it should not, the countermeasure is how to remove it.
  5. It writes the countermeasure as a ticket, a procedure (SOP) or an automation spec, to copy or download as Markdown.
  6. Check-ins at day 7, 14 and 30 ask whether the fix held. Hours identified (typed at intake) and hours confirmed (from check-ins) are shown apart, never added.
Three fixes, three check-ins eachEach fix is asked about at day 7, 14 and 30. Only the answers people give are recorded.

Illustrative, no real data

Illustrative check-in answers for three example fixes, written by us
Example fixDay 7Day 14Day 30
Fix AHeldHeldHeld
Fix BHeldHeldPartly
Fix CHeldPartlyReverted

A reverted fix counts nothing.

Two figures, kept apartWhat someone estimated at the start and what a check showed after the change are different facts, so they are shown side by side and never combined.
Identified and confirmed figuresTwo cards side by side. Identified: typed by the reporter at the start, a dashed card. Confirmed: from check-in answers after the change, a solid card with a check mark. Each holds either figure as typed or the words no figure. Between them a crossed-out plus sign: the two are never added.Identifiedtyped by the reporterat the startfigure as typedor: no figureConfirmedfrom check-in answersafter the changefigure as typedor: no figureneveradded
  • Never added, averaged or divided into one figure or a ratio.
  • No figure is not zero. A friction reported without a number shows “no figure”.
  • Nothing projected. One person’s figure is not multiplied across a team or a year.

It is priced per workspace, not per person: Team and Department plans, with a 14-day free trial and no card. See pricing. You can try it with one friction before creating an account; nothing is sent until you sign in and submit.

When KaizenProof is not the right fit

  • You need single sign-on (SSO) or audit logs: KaizenProof has neither today.
  • You need live connections to Jira, Slack, Microsoft Teams or similar: countermeasures are text to copy or download, not integrations.
  • You run a Six Sigma programme and need statistics or control charts: see Kaizen vs Lean vs Six Sigma.
  • You want idea campaigns with voting across a large company: an idea platform fits better.
  • Your problems are on a factory floor rather than in office work: the product's words and examples are written for offices.

Questions

Is there free Kaizen software?

A shared spreadsheet or board costs nothing and works for recording problems. KaizenProof has a 14-day free trial with no card, and its course on Kaizen for office work is free to read without an account.

Do we need a Lean expert to use Kaizen software?

Not with a guided tool. KaizenProof asks the questions and names the waste in plain words; the person who knows the work answers them.

Try it on your own work

Pick one task that wastes your team's time every week. Describe it in a sentence; KaizenProof names the waste, asks why until you reach the cause, and writes the fix. No account is needed to start.