Lesson 19 of 23 · 6 min read
Problems are not faults: blame the process, not the person
In Lean: psychological safety, no blame
Builds on: Small improvements, every week, The 5 Whys in depth
In one minute
A problem in the work is information about the process, not evidence of someone's fault. When people expect blame, they hide problems, and a hidden problem cannot be fixed. Psychological safety means people in a team expect that raising a problem, admitting a mistake or questioning a step will not get them punished or embarrassed. Rewording blame into a statement about the process is a small, everyday way to build it.
The idea
Most office errors happen because the process makes them easy: a form that accepts a missing field, two tools that disagree, a rule nobody owns, a step that depends on memory. Put someone else in the same seat with the same process, on a busy day, and sooner or later they make the same mistake. That is why Lean looks at the process first. It is also simply fairer.
There is a practical reason too. Reporting a friction means saying "this does not work", often about work you or a colleague did. If the last person who raised a problem was criticised for it, nobody raises the next one. The team still has its problems; it just stops knowing about them. Safe to speak up (a term Lean borrowed from the study of teams: psychological safety) is therefore not a nicety. It is what keeps the supply of problems flowing, and problems are what improvement runs on.
Rewording blame takes three steps.
- Say what happened, as a fact, without a name: "the invoice was paid twice", not "Sam paid it twice".
- Ask what in the process allowed it: "the system accepts a second invoice with the same number from the same supplier".
- Name the change that would make it hard for anyone: "warn on a duplicate invoice number at entry".
More rewordings:
- "She always forgets to update the tracker" becomes "the tracker is updated by hand after the work, so it falls behind on busy days".
- "Sales never fill in the form properly" becomes "the form can be sent without the billing contact".
- "IT is slow" becomes "access requests have no target date and wait in one general queue".
What no blame is not.
- Not "nobody is responsible". People still own countermeasures and standards. Owning a fix is different from being blamed for a problem.
- Not pretending nothing happened. You can say a step was missed. The next question is what let it be missed.
- Not about rare deliberate wrongdoing. That is handled by other means. Everyday frictions are not misconduct, and treating every error as if it might be stops people reporting.
Leads set the tone with their first reaction to bad news. Thank people for raising problems, above all their own mistakes. Meet a reverted change with curiosity. Say "we" and "the process". What happens the first time someone reports a problem decides whether there is a second time.
Example
Illustrative example, not a real company.
In a payroll team, a new employee's first salary was paid into the wrong bank account. The payroll lead opened the team meeting with: "Thank you for flagging this so fast. Let's look at how the bank details got into the system."
The specialist who entered them explained that the details came from a scanned form that was hard to read, and she had typed what she could make out. The whys showed that bank details were always keyed by hand from scans, with no step where the employee confirmed them. The countermeasure: new employees enter their own bank details in the HR portal and confirm them there. The friction names no one.
A month later the same specialist reported a second friction, about tax codes. She had seen what happened when a problem was raised: it got fixed, and nobody was blamed.
Common mistakes
- Hidden blame. "Some people" or "a certain team" still points at people, just without names.
- Confusing no blame with no ownership. Someone still owns the fix.
- Asking for openness, then reacting with frustration. People believe the reaction, not the request.
Words to know
- Safe to speak up (often called psychological safety): people in a team expect that raising a problem, a mistake or a doubt will not be punished.
- Ask what, not who (in Lean: blame-free problem solving): tracing a problem to the process that allowed it.
Check your understanding
Try it on your own work
Describe one recurring task that wastes your time, and see these ideas applied to it.
Where this comes from
Looking for causes in the system rather than in individuals runs through the Toyota Production System and the quality-management tradition; psychological safety is an idea from the study of teams that Lean practice has widely adopted.